The Myth of the Soul Clarence Darrow (1929) Intro to Philosophy Professor Douglas Olena Belief in Immortality 422 There is a widespread belief in immortality. According to this belief, death is not the end of life. There is a determination by those who believe this to avoid thinking about the alternative, as I did. The myth of immortality will stand in the way of a sensible adjustment to facts. Many who believe in immortality still tell themselves and others that neither side of the question is susceptible of proof. What Proof Involves 422 What constitutes proof? The evidence against the persistence of personal consciousness is as strong as the evidence of gravitationŠ. It is as convincing and unassailable as the proof of the destruction of wood or coal by fire. If it is not certain that death ends personal identity and memory, then almost nothing that man accepts as true is susceptible of proof. Relics of the Past 422 The beliefs of the race and its individuals are relics of the past. Without careful examination, no one can begin to understand how many of manıs cherished opinions have no foundation in fact. After all, is it not better to look the question squarely in the face and find out whether we are harboring a delusion. New York and Goofville 423 The success of this analogy requires a monist/materialist foundation. He assumes at the outset that there is nothing called ³fact² that doesnıt fall under the rubric of materialist science. For the analogy to fail there must be at least a dualist perspective. Belief 423 Belief implies a condition of mind that accepts a certain idea. This condition can be brought about only by evidence. Whatever that evidence may be, ³it may be wholly insufficient for reasoning men; but, good or bad, it must be enough for the believer to believe.² Evidence for Immortality? 423 Upon what evidenceŠ are we asked to believe in immortality? There is no evidence. Perhaps evidence can be found to support a positive conviction that immortality is a delusion. The two claims, that there is a soul which persists after death and that there is a resurrection of the body will be examined. Immortality of the Soul 423 The belief in life after death is very old. Dead relatives visited living ones in dreams and visions. This belief requires dualism and must remain ignorant of the beginnings and endings of normal animal life. 424 If that which is called a ³soul² is a separate entity apart from the body, when, then, and where and how was this soul placed in the human structure? If man has a soul it must creep in sometime during the period of gestation and growth. Immortality of the Soul 424 The beginnings of life yield no evidence of the beginnings of a soul. It is idle to say that something in the human being which we call ³life² is the soul itself, for the soul is generally taken to distinguish human beings from other forms of life. 425 If the thing which we call ³life² is the soul, then cows have souls; and in the very nature of things, we must allow souls to all forms of life and to inorganic matter as well. Immortality of the Soul 425 Some say ³consciousness² will remain after death. This is what we mean by soul. Consciousness cannot exist before the age of 3, 4 or 5 then. The believer suggests (on Darrowıs account) that because you were unconscious of your life before birth, couldnıt you as well be unconscious of your life after death now? In response, Darrow concludes: My fading memory of the events that filled the early years of my life leads me to the opposite conclusion. Immortality of the Soul 425 Darrow continues: The mind and consciousness of the boy are already dead. Even now, am I fully alive? At old age memory which binds me to the past will already be dead. 426 I am sure that if I die of what is called ³old age,² my consciousness will gradually slip away with my failing emotions; I shall no more be aware of the near approach of final dissolution than is the dying tree. Immortality of the Soul 426 If the soul persists after death, where does it go? There is no evidence that such place exists. In view of modern knowledge, can any one really believe in the persistence of individual life and memory? (always the appeal to modern knowledge, implying science and materialism) Resurrection of the Body 426 Resurrection is a purely religious doctrine. Elijah, Jesus, Paul The issue turns on the difference between superstition, religion, tradition and modern science. Resurrection of the Body 427 We become variously ³At the banquet of life, in turn, a guest and a dish.² Our bodies are first the eaters then the eaten, after death. How are our bodies going to be resurrected then? Will our bits and pieces be rescued from the myriad bodies that have ingested them? Absurd! Darrowıs view uses the analogy with burning wood or coal to talk about human life and consciousness. When itıs gone it is done with. Destruction 428 The You or I which is known to our friends does not consist of an immaterial something called a ³soul² which cannot be conceived. We know perfectly well what we mean when we talk about this You and Me: And it is equally plain that the whole fabric that makes up our separate personalities is destroyed, dispersed, disintegrated beyond repair by what we call death. Desire for Immortality 428 Those who refuse to give up the idea of immortality declare that nature never creates a desire without providing the means for its satisfaction. Nature creates many desires that it does not satisfy. There is no emotion demanding eternal life. There is only yearning to keep on living. ³What we long for is a continuation of our present state of existence, not an uncertain reincarnation in a mysterious world of which we know nothing.² Schopenhauer Moral Resolve 429 When we fully understand the brevity of life, its fleeting joys and unavoidable pains; when we accept the fact that all men and women are approaching an inevitable doom: the consciousness of it should make us more kindly and considerate of each other. Moral Resolve 429 The feeling should make men and women use their best efforts to help their fellow travellers on the road, to make the path brighter and easier as we journey on. It should bring a closer kinship, a better understanding, and a deeper sympathy for the wayfarers who must live a common life and die a common death.